Comparing AHP and ANP: An Application of Strategic Decisions Making in a Manufacturing Company
نویسنده
چکیده
Successful strategic decisions provide the appropriate operational actions for the right markets at the correct time. Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats (SWOT) analysis is a generally used tool which examines strengths and weaknesses of organization or industry together with opportunities and threats of the marketplace environment. SWOT framework provides the basic outline in which to perform analysis of decision situations. In this study, the lack of determination of the importance ranking for the SWOT factors, we proposed to enhance SWOT analysis with multicriteria decision making techniques called Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Analytic Network Process (ANP). AHP approach achieves pairwise comparisons among factors or criteria in order to prioritize them at each level of the hierarchy using the eigenvalue calculation. In addition to AHP, ANP technique is a general form that allows interdependencies, outerdependencies and feedbacks among decision elements in the hierarchical or non hierarchical structures. The main purpose of this paper is to explain how to use the AHP and ANP methods for prioritize of SWOT factors and compare them.
منابع مشابه
Comparison between Ahp and Anp: Case Study of Strategic Planning of E-learning Implementation
The specific objectives of the paper are: validation of the theoretical model for strategic planning of e-learning implementation by means of factor analysis, presentation of the structure of AHP and ANP models for decision making about e-learning implementation, comparison between developed AHP and ANP models, analysis of the results of group decision making supported by sw TeamEC2000 based on...
متن کاملSustainable Supply Chain: a Modification Suggestion to an Existing Strategic Framework
Supply chain management is a prosperous area of research for AHP/ANP scientists. There have already been quite a few AHP/ANP applications. This presentation suggests an improvement in one of the existing ANP based strategic decision frameworks published in the literature. The published strategic framework for green supply chain management considers product life cycle (PLC) influence, the impact...
متن کاملSupplier Selection and Evaluation by Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methodology
In this study, an outsourcer evaluation and management system is developed for a manufacturing company by use of Fuzzy goal programming (FGP). A first phase of the methodology evaluation criteria for outsources and the objectives of the company are determined. Considering the fuzziness in the decision data, linguistic variables that can be expressed in generalized fuzzy number are used. The pro...
متن کاملAn application of logarithmic fuzzy preference programming-based AHP and FRS techniques to develop and prioritize strategic objectives
Vital decisions made at the strategic level in an organization are not only intricate but also costly to alter. It is therefore important to find a comprehensive approach to deal with such a possibility. One of the major problems of a common balanced scorecard (BSC)-based model in strategic management is lack of a ranking system for strategic objectives in order to enable prioritization of the ...
متن کاملSuppliers Selection In Manufacturing Industries And Associated Multi-Objective Desicion Making Methods: Past, Present And The Future
Nowadays, many manufacturing companies have decided to use other companies’ competencies and outsource part of their manufacturing processes and business to suppliers globally in order to reduce costs, improve quality of products, explore or expand new markets, and offer better services to customers, etc. The decisions have rendered manufacturing organizations with new challenges. Organizations...
متن کامل